Over forty years after its
Broadway debut as an American Tribal Love-Rock musical, Hair allows
us to see just why it was such a daring, innovative form in musical theatre.
Sure, this ground-breaking, non-linear musical came out of a different time
and space: things in headline news have changed since those heady, drugged
out, drop-out days, but they haven’t changed that much. Instead of the
Vietnam War—that unconscionable slaughter-house for a generation—there’s
Iraq and Afghanistan, so do I hear “quagmire” trembling out of that long
tunnel at the end of which that light seems to be a mere rumour? There’s
also sex, drugs, and the Culture Wars that give ma Praise be to Gerome Ragni and
James Rado who composed the original libretto and lyrics. Praise be to Galt
MacDermot who composed the music. But equal praise, perhaps, to Diane Paulus
for taking the musical by its lovely locks and shaking off the dust of ages
to reveal their real lustre. Her production, that began life at the
Delacorte Theater in Central Park before making its way to Broadway, has
rearranged the material, added to the lyrics, updating them with some
contemporary references, and ensuring that the story (such as there is one)
of Claude (the young immigrant Englishman who becomes a victim of his
parents’ and society’s brainwashing) is a strong strand in a wonderful
weaving of themes. With its intense looseness—that is more an illusion than
fact—Ms. Paulus’ production reminds us that Hair is a “happening”
rather than a conventional play. Hippies are old-fashioned relics now—just
as Beatniks are—but their spontaneous, freewheeling freedom, the immediacy
of their concerns, the stinging criticism of society that they articulated,
and their beliefs in free love and life are not without contemporary appeal.
The “ocean of reality” in Hair is love—not a touch-feely kind of
creepy love, but a love for counter-culture and the tribe of mankind. Waves
of love lap the audience before the show actually begins as characters from
the cast mingle with the crowd, indulging in warm repartee, before gathering
on stage as Sasha Allen launches into “Aquarius,” the tune that became a hit
single all its own in the early days of the first production. The melody and
lyrics bathe the auditorium with benign phosphorescence, and from there,
everything is a trip into a special universe, rife with anomalies, often an
unweeded garden but sometimes fretted with golden fire. I echo Hamlet, of
course, and one of his monologues is, indeed, turned into a song for Claude,
that Gavin Creel makes a splendid highlight (“What a piece of work is man”). Tribe and music: these are two of
the strongest driving forces. Ms. Paulus’ large cast seems born for the
special temper of her show. Michael MacDonald has costumed them in the
iconic manner of the sixties, with dyed cottons, denims, wools, and fringed
leathers, and Kevin Adams has cast gaudy glows on their euphoria. The tribe
in Hair is a motley collection of anomalies: some sweet, some benign;
others bitter or acid. They represent youth, of course, but more than this,
they represent a creed. I would have said “philosophy,” but that word
implies an articulated system, at once coherent, precise, ramified, and
deep. The trouble with so much of the sixties and early seventies
generations was their fuzzy thinking that produced a wild, woolly, wanton
exaggeration of simple ideas. Those youth were right, of course, about the
Vietnam War—as they were to protest other societal ills, but what they
offered in return seemed simplistic and often meretricious. However, in the
long shadow of time, they now seem prescient in their protest and polemical
motive. What this tribe wants, above all, is celebration—not knotty
discourse—and it achieves this splendidly. The ensemble has enviable
presence, but there are standouts. Will Swenson’s Berger is given to
overly-persistent drug-induced euphoria, but he has terrific colour and
force. Paris Remillard’s Woof (an understudy for Bryce Ryness) is
appropriately inchoate, though his Mick Jagger mimicry needs improvement.
The Crissy at the performance I attended was Kaitlyn Kiyan (subbing for
Allison Case), who was full of sweet yearning in “Frank Mills.” Megan
Lawrence and Andrew Kober as Mom and Dad have a sharp sense of satire, and
when Kober gets into a dress, he is funnier than ever. But the most
sensitive performance (aided, no doubt, by the libretto) is Gavin Creel’s
Claude that turns ambivalence into a poignant existential experience.
One of the special surprises is the richness of the score. Hair is not just a rock musical; it is a clever, dynamic pastiche of various musical styles and tempi. “Donna” has almost a jive tempo and quality; “I Believe in Love” has a spiritual sound; “Hare Krishna” is pure incantation; “Don’t Put It Down” could be hillbilly; “Electric Blues” is set to a rock beat; while “Easy To Be Hard” (beautifully sung by Cassie Levy) is a marvelous rhythm and blues number. Some numbers are as fast as electricity (“Three-Five-Zero-Zero”), and at least one deconstructs itself intriguingly (the end of “Ain’t Got No”). The songs don’t always end in a traditional way. Sometimes they just stop, and at other times they segue immediately into another number. A minuet or do-wop will suddenly crop up or parody will unexpectedly pop up in an orgiastic chorale. Irony is often built into a song’s structure and sound, so there isn’t a single number that does not serve a point or theme either directly or obliquely. Scott Pask’s exposed brick-wall set has minimal dressing, and that is probably how it should be in this case. The musicians are clearly visible—also as they should be—as they let the music flood the auditorium with exuberant sensuousness. They, as much as the cast, seem to be hormonally charged to the nth degree. Their love for the music and the cast’s love for singing it quickly become infectious. Rarely have I seen an audience so enraptured. If nostalgia plays into the equation, what’s wrong with that? But I suspect that genius has more to do with defining and charging this show than nostalgia.
|